Arbitration is a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) where a dispute between two or more parties agree is decided by a neutral third party, known as an arbitrator or a panel of arbitrators appointed pursuant to the agreement of the disputing parties. This agreement between the disputing parties to resolve their dispute is referred to as arbitration agreement.
Unlike litigation, which involves courts and judges, arbitration is a private and flexible process that allows parties to tailor proceedings to their needs. It is widely used for commercial disputes, especially when confidentiality, speed, and expert decision-making are required. In Singapore, arbitration is an increasingly popular method for both businesses and individuals to resolve their dispute alongside mediation and litigation.
Arbitration is suitable for various types of disputes, including domestic and international commercial conflicts. It is commonly used for:
Arbitration, although commonly misunderstood, is not a form of informal negotiation between individuals and businesses. Additionally, arbitration is not mediation.
When parties agree to arbitrate any dispute and submit the dispute to the arbitrator/panel of arbitrators, the arbitrator has to power, similar to a judge, to decide matters that is binding upon the parties. The award (or the decision given) by the Arbitrator has the same effect as a court’s decision, meaning it is enforceable.
Arbitration cannot be a solution for every dispute. Not every dispute can be arbitrated. Usually commercial disputes, contractual disputes can be arbitrated but issues relating to criminal matters simply cannot be arbitrated.
Arbitration cannot be forced on parties. Arbitration can only take place if parties have consented to it.
Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|
Confidentiality – Unlike litigation, arbitration keeps disputes private. | Costs – Arbitration can be expensive, especially with multiple arbitrators. |
Faster resolution – Avoids court backlog and lengthy proceedings. | Limited appeal rights – Arbitration awards are difficult to challenge. |
Expert arbitrators – Parties can choose arbitrators with industry-specific expertise. | Lack of precedent – Unlike litigation, arbitration decisions do not create binding legal precedents. |
Flexibility – Parties can customize the procedure and timeline. | Enforcement challenges – Some jurisdictions may not fully comply with enforcement mechanisms. |
Cross-border enforceability – Awards are enforceable in multiple jurisdictions. | Potential imbalance – If arbitration clauses favor one party, it may lead to unfair outcomes. |
Arbitration in Singapore is a well-structured alternative dispute resolution method, commonly chosen for its efficiency, confidentiality, and enforceability. The arbitration process generally follows a clear sequence of steps, as outlined below:
Singapore’s arbitration framework is governed by the following laws:
The cost of arbitration depends on factors such as case complexity, the number of arbitrators, and hearing duration:
Firstly, arbitration is a consensual process. This means that the parties can decide whether each party want to bear their own cost or if the “losing” party should bear all the cost.
Importantly, there are different types of cost associated in an arbitration
Cost allocation follows Section 21 of the International Arbitration Act
Arbitrators can be professionals with legal, industry, or subject-matter expertise. The selection process is determined by the arbitration agreement or institutional rules, such as those of SIAC.
This means that either the parties can agree and choose one arbitrator, or an arbitration tribunal may be formed according to the applicable rules to oversee the appointment and conduct of the proceedings.
Arbitration decisions, known as arbitral awards, are generally final and binding on the parties. Unlike court judgments, , arbitration awards can be challenged on “limited grounds”.
In Singapore, under the International Arbitration Act and the Arbitration Act, an arbitration award can only be set aside under specific circumstances, such as:
– Instances of fraud, corruption, or undue influence in the arbitration process.
– Situations where the arbitrator exceeded their jurisdiction or the award conflicts with public policy.
– Cases involving serious procedural irregularity affecting the fairness of the proceedings.
However, these challenges are rare and difficult to succeed, making arbitration a reliable and conclusive dispute resolution method. The finality of arbitration is one of its main advantages, as it prevents drawn-out legal battles commonly seen in litigation.
As dispute resolution experts, we strongly recommend arbitration for businesses seeking efficient, enforceable, and confidential resolutions. Compared to litigation, arbitration offers:
For businesses operating internationally, arbitration is an ideal mechanism to protect commercial interests while maintaining confidentiality and neutrality.
We provide solutions to the table for all our clients regardless of the scale or complexity of the cases. Let us know how we can help.
Contact Us